Employees working in the financial industry may suffer serious consequences if they lose their jobs following their complaints about illegal practices like discrimination, retaliation, and more. Even with broad discretion in employment decisions, some terminations are subject to federal and state protection.
There are reporting requirements and rules financial firms have to follow under SOX and the Dodd-Frank Act. These regulations safeguard certain employees who come forward with complaints. A single termination dispute in this sector can involve claims under more than one federal law.
There were 88,201 new discrimination charges processed by the EEOC in fiscal year 2025. Of the 94 merits lawsuits this agency took to court, 64 included allegations of discharge or constructive discharge.
After a rights violation, employees may recover lost income, lost benefits, and legal fees. Statutory damages are available in some cases, and emotional distress compensation may also apply, according to the Park APC employment law website https://www.park-lawyers.com/.
The circumstances surrounding the decision, the employee’s protected activity, and applicable employment laws can determine whether a termination may violate the law. Let’s take a closer look.
At-Will Is the Default, and the Exceptions Are the Whole Case
Employment across most of the country runs at will, meaning either side can end it at almost any time for almost any reason. A wrongful termination claim is not an argument that a firing was unfair.
The argument is the theory that the termination fell into one of the carve-outs, such as discrimination based on a protected class, retaliation for taking part in protected activities, or breach of an actual contract.
Why this framing is important is that terminations in this industry are rarely ever labeled as such. Performance management, restructuring, and reallocation of a book of business three weeks following an employee’s escalation about valuation can all be found in one file.
The Exit Paperwork Does Its Own Work
In this industry, departing employees are often asked to sign separation papers before they have sought legal advice. These agreements are likely to have terms that include severance, waivers of claims, noncompetition, non-solicitation, and garden leave. These documents may also allow for the forfeiture of deferred cash or stock. The employer will often give the employee a deadline to accept a severance package, creating more pressure to sign.
Restrictive covenants in particular are often handled as business litigation matters. A Gallatin business litigation lawyer can evaluate whether a non-compete was valid, whether the contract was violated, and how much harm a violation caused, for either a company or a separated employee.
The area of law involved often depends on which documents the parties dispute first.
Financial Services Has Its Own Retaliation Statute
Employees of publicly traded companies and their contractors have a dedicated federal remedy under the whistleblower section of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which the Labor Department administers through OSHA before any court action.
The window is short. A complaint must reach OSHA within 180 days of the violation, or within 180 days of the employee becoming aware of it.
The next question is what employees must prove in their timely complaint. UBS argued that whistleblowers also must establish retaliatory intent, but the Supreme Court rejected that argument. In February of 2024, Murray v. UBS Securities LLC was decided unanimously, confirming that proof of intentional retaliation is not required. Employees must show that their protected activity was a contributing factor in the adverse employment action.
After the employee makes that showing, the employer can still defeat the claim. It must prove by clear and convincing evidence that it would have taken the same action even without the protected activity.
Remedies include reinstatement with the same seniority and back pay with interest. Special damages cover litigation costs, expert witness fees, and attorney fees.
Where You Report Changes What Protects You
Two federal whistleblower regimes run alongside each other, and they do not cover the same people.
Reporting to the SEC in writing, and doing so before any retaliation, is what brings a person under Dodd-Frank retaliation protection. Digital Realty Trust v. Somers, decided by the Supreme Court in 2018, settled that the SEC report is a requirement.
An employee who raised concerns only through internal compliance may hold a Sarbanes-Oxley claim and no Dodd-Frank claim at all.
Dodd-Frank allows double back pay with interest for a successful retaliation claim. Reinstatement and attorney’s fees may also be awarded.
Leave a Reply